(New York, NY) In the ever-evolving landscape of retail finance, Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) is reshaping the way consumers approach their borrowing and purchasing decisions. As store card ownership wanes, BNPL has emerged as a compelling option for modern shoppers seeking flexibility and convenience. Auriemma Group’s latest issues of The Payments Report and Cardbeat US uncover the factors driving point-of-sale decisioning between BNPL and store cards, and how a good BNPL experience can increase store card acquisition.
Buy Now, Pay Later directly competes with store cards at the point-of-sale.
BNPL offers have become commonplace when shopping online or in-store. According to The Payments Report, 64% of debit cardholders say they have been offered an installment plan online (up from 45% in Q4-2019). In-store offers have also increased slightly, now at 36%. And about half of those offered an installment plan in either channel report enrolling in the past 12 months. This momentum is in direct contrast to store cards, whose ownership has dropped 14-percentage points (now 39%) since 2015.
“We found that at the point-of-sale cardholders are most interested in applying for these products for larger ticket size purchases,” says Jonathan O’Connor, Senior Manager of Research at Auriemma. “However, when both Buy Now, Pay Later and store cards are offered, cardholders are near evenly split on which option to select, with a slight preference towards Buy Now, Pay Later.”
But what would happen if retailers only offered store card applications at the point-of-sale? Not offering BNPL at the point-of-sale would have a marked impact on store credit card enrollment. 54% of those more likely to select BNPL say they would be likely to apply for a store card instead, if it were the only option presented to them.
Fee amounts and interest rates inform cardholders’ application decisions.
About four-in-ten debit cardholders say a retailer’s recommendation would make them likely to apply for a BNPL plan (41%) or store credit card (35%) at the point-of-sale. However, according to Auriemma’s research, it is the least important of the factors tested.
While a retailer’s recommendation or signage may initiate decisioning, BNPL and store card acquisition often hinges on fees, rates, and benefits. Over eight-in-ten debit cardholders say these factors are at least somewhat important when deciding whether to apply for a BNPL plan or store card at the point-of-sale. Second tier factors include trust in the brand, credit score impact, and one-time discount offers.
“Buy Now, Pay Later plans offer consumers payment flexibility without the commitment of applying for a credit card,” says O’Connor. “And while in many ways Buy Now, Pay Later can be seen as a competitor to card product acquisition and usage, the method can act as a gateway to a future card relationship.”
A good Buy Now, Pay Later experience could open the doors to store card application.
While there is much to be said about the ways BNPL competes against store cards, there is also evidence that the option could create a pipeline to store card enrollment. According to Cardbeat US, 41% of credit cardholders say a good BNPL experience with a brand they shop at regularly is likely to encourage them to apply for a store card, if offered. This is particularly true of Gen Z and Millennial cardholders.
54% of credit cardholders who were approved for a BNPL plan say they were offered a store card at some point during their experience. Notably, 69% of these cardholders applied and were approved for a store card during that time, highlighting just how synergistic the two products can be.
“Buy Now, Pay Later does have an impact on store card application, but the pendulum swings both ways,” says O’Connor. “Some consumers will choose Buy Now, Pay Later at the point-of-sale over and over again, while some will inevitably find their way to store card enrollment through positive BNPL experiences, demonstrating the potentially symbiotic relationship between the two offerings.”
Survey Methodology
The Payments Report
This Auriemma Group study was conducted online within the US by an independent field service provider on behalf of Auriemma Group (Auriemma) in March and April 2024 among 800 adult debit cardholders. The number of interviews completed for both is sufficient to allow for statistical significance testing among sub-groups at the 95% confidence level ±5%, unless otherwise noted. The purpose of the research was not disclosed, nor did respondents know the criteria for qualifying.
Cardbeat US
This Auriemma Group study was conducted online within the US by an independent field service provider on behalf of Auriemma Group (Auriemma) in March 2024 among 800 adult credit cardholders. The number of interviews completed for both is sufficient to allow for statistical significance testing among sub-groups at the 95% confidence level ±5%, unless otherwise noted. The purpose of the research was not disclosed, nor did respondents know the criteria for qualifying.
About Auriemma Group
For 40 years, Auriemma’s mission has been to empower clients with authoritative data and actionable insights. Our team comprises recognized experts in four primary areas: operational effectiveness, consumer research, co-brand partnerships, and corporate finance. Our business intelligence and advisory services give clients access to the data, expertise and tools they need to navigate an increasingly complex environment and maximize their performance. Auriemma serves the consumer financial services ecosystem from our offices in New York City and London. For more information, email Jonathan O’Connor at research@auriemma.group.
(New York, NY) Credit card late fees have been a hot topic since February when the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed rules aimed at reducing them. The proposal would reduce the cap for late fees to $8 per month (from $41 today), prohibit annual inflation increases on late fee amounts, and ensure that late fees must not exceed 25% of the required payment. Auriemma Group’s latest issue of Cardbeat US uncovered how consumers feel about late fees, the proposed rule changes, and if they would be willing to accept changes to their card products that may occur as a result of the new $8 maximum.
Late fees are top-of-mind for repayment.
Auriemma’s research found that ongoing interest rates (67%) and late fee amounts (62%) are at least somewhat influential when considering how to prioritize paying off credit card balances. However, many cardholders continue to struggle. The CFPB’s biennial report to Congress on the consumer credit card market found that credit card companies charged consumers $25 billion in fees last year, and an additional $105 billion in interest.
“The big question is how to help a struggling population without hindering consumers unaffected by late fees,” says Jonathan O’Connor, Senior Manager of Research at Auriemma. “For now, late fee waivers play a key role in maintaining that balance. While 18% of credit cardholders have been charged at least 1 late fee in the past 12 months, on average, 69% of late fees charged are waived, according to Auriemma’s data.”
And while there are some cardholders that continue to be challenged by late fees, many credit cardholders express positive sentiments about them. Roughly eight-in-ten agree that they encourage timely repayment (83%) and incentivize responsible credit card usage (76%). Still, three-quarters of those who have been charged a late fee say they make it difficult to get out of debt, underscoring the importance of the CFPB’s proposal.
Most believe new late fee rules would have a positive consumer impact.
Awareness of the proposed late fee rule change is limited, but notable. 32% of credit cardholders say they have at least heard of the CFPB’s proposed amendments to Regulation Z, which “implements the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), to better ensure that the late fees charged on credit card accounts are ‘reasonable and proportional’ to the late payment as required under TILA.”
After being provided a description of the proposed rule changes, 67% of cardholders said the CFPB’s proposed late fee rule change would have a positive impact on the average credit cardholder, if enacted. Few (9%) believe the regulation would have a negative impact.
“Those who feel positive tend to believe the changes will make repayment more manageable and provide some needed financial relief,” says O’Connor. “However, detractors worry the change would force issuers to increase interest rates or devalue rewards.”
45% of credit cardholders are unwilling to change their current credit cards’ offerings for an $8 late fee.
Though many respond to the CFPB’s proposed changes positively, if negative alterations need to be enacted to introduce an $8 late fee cap, most would be unlikely to continue using the card. According to Cardbeat US, the most acceptable exchanges, cited by 20% of cardholders, would be to reduce the card’s rewards value or increase the card’s APR by 10%. The least attractive option would be to reduce statement credits or cashback redemption value.
“An $8 late fee cap can help consumers and issuers alike, if rolled out thoughtfully,” says O’Connor. “No cardholder wants to see their card’s value watered down to make room for reduced late fees they may never encounter, but the change could significantly help those in the direst financial straits better manage their repayments.”
If implemented, an industry-wide $8 late fee cap could cause market share shifts based on implementation. Auriemma’s research found that while many cardholders don’t want to relinquish rewards, benefits, or increase annual fees or APR in exchange for lower late fees, issuers able to offer the lower fee without degrading their card’s value too strongly may see a marked impact on acquisition and retention, while also aiding the cardholders in their portfolio who may be struggling.
Survey Methodology
Cardbeat US
This Auriemma Group study was conducted online within the US by an independent field service provider on behalf of Auriemma Group (Auriemma) in September 2023 among 802 adult credit cardholders. The number of interviews completed for both is sufficient to allow for statistical significance testing among sub-groups at the 95% confidence level ±5%, unless otherwise noted. The purpose of the research was not disclosed, nor did respondents know the criteria for qualifying.
About Auriemma Group
For nearly 40 years, Auriemma’s mission has been to empower clients with authoritative data and actionable insights. Our team comprises recognized experts in four primary areas: operational effectiveness, consumer research, co-brand partnerships, and corporate finance. Our business intelligence and advisory services give clients access to the data, expertise and tools they need to navigate an increasingly complex environment and maximize their performance. Auriemma serves the consumer financial services ecosystem from our offices in New York City and London. For more information, call Jonathan O’Connor at (+1) 1-646-437-6116.